How rational are indications for emergency caesarean section in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania?
نویسندگان
چکیده
The rate of caesarean section (CS) at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) in Tanzania has been on progressive increase for past three decades. Concerns have been raised if this increase is justified by rational decisions but no study so far has investigated this problem. The aim of the study was to find out whether decisions made for CS comply with a set of locally made standards, with an assumption that if the standards are met, then the increase in CS rate seen at MNH is genuine. The five most common indications for CS were identified from the obstetric electronic data base. Most common indications included obstructed labour, cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD), failure to progress, repeat CS and foetal distress. Criteria for the best practice for each indication were developed based on the National guidelines and local expert consensus. Information extracted from the case notes, antenatal cards and partographs were compared to the standard audit criteria and the decision judged as standard or substandard. Three hundred forty five women had a decision made for emergency CS. Repeat CS was the most frequent indication (30.2%), followed by obstructed labour (14.4%) and foetal distress (13.6%). Audit of 324 women's files showed that 30% of women had substandard decisions for CS mostly in the foetal distress group (59.1%) and least in the repeat CS group (9.1%). Among the-324 mothers with decision for emergency CS, 279 (86.1%) delivered by CS as decided and 45 (13.9%) delivered vaginally before CS could be performed. Women who delivered vaginally after decision for CS and the nulliparous women had significantly more substandard decisions compared to those delivered by CS and parous women respectively. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of decisions for emergency CS made in the hospital is substandard and may contain women in whom surgical intervention could be avoided. This calls for a need to improve quality of assessment and decision before performing CS.
منابع مشابه
Rate and Indications of Elective and Emergency Caesarean Section; a Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar.
BACKGROUND The study was conducted to determine the rate and clinical indications for emergency and elective caesarean section. METHODS This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted from December 2010 to January 2011 in Gynaecology unit-A of Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. Consecutive patients who gave birth in the hospital during the study period were included in the study. There we...
متن کاملبررسی فراوانی و علل سزارین در استان یزد، سال 1388
IntroductionToday, c/s is performed as a usual surgery. Not only it involves a lot of facilities, hospital beds, and specialists, but also risk of death for mother and baby is more than natural childbirth. This study intends to investigate the prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Yazd Province as a first step to reduce caesarean section. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conduct...
متن کاملChanging trends in indications for caesarean sections in a tertiary hospital.
OBJECTIVES To study the caesarean section rate and the trends in indications for caesarean delivery at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) during two study periods of 6 months each. MATERIALS AND METHODS The percentages of caesarean sections attributable to specific indications were computed for the first 6 months of 1998 and the last 6 months of 2001. Subgroup analysis of "less common indic...
متن کاملDeterminants of caesarean section in a tertiary hospital.
OBJECTIVE To analyse the different indications and frequency of caesarean sections in order to reduce such deliveries in a tertiary hospital. METHODS The retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from January 1 to December 31, 2011. It comprised review of clinical records of all patients who underwent caesarean secti...
متن کاملCaesarean section among referred and self-referred birthing women: a cohort study from a tertiary hospital, northeastern Tanzania
BACKGROUND The inequity in emergency obstetric care access in Tanzania is unsatisfactory. Despite an existing national obstetric referral system, many birthing women bypass referring facilities and go directly to higher-level care centres. We wanted to compare Caesarean section (CS) rates among women formally referred to a tertiary care centre versus self-referred women, and to assess the effec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Tanzania journal of health research
دوره 14 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012